Minister’s Reference 0531102449

Date 08/03/2017

Dear Minister Fitzgerald,

In response to your recent email dated 3rd March 2017, relating to the correspondence I emailed to your office dated June 10th 2016 I wish to state the following.
I appreciate the fact that you requested a Garda report to fully address my concerns, and fully trained investigators have since investigated the allegations I made and referred a file to the Director of Prosecutions (DPP).

However this further squandering of Tax Payers money could all have been avoided;

If Sean O Fearghail Ceann Comhairle allowed Clare Daly TD to question you Tanaiste and Minister for Justice and Equality re the legal grounds upon which members of An Garda Siochana in County Roscommon entered my home on 20th May 2016.

The written reason given to Clare Daly TD was “The question is not in order as it requires an interpretation of the law and relates not to a policy issue but to an individual case which is an operational one for An Garda Siochana. Begs the question who ordered this Garda operation bearing in mind that you Minister Fitzgerald requested a Garda report after you received my correspondence dated 10th June 2016.

If Robert B Marren Solicitor had performed his duties as appointed by Judge Mary Laffoy to administer the Estate of my Late Brother Patrick Gavin. Marren followed the clear instructions of the other beneficiaries, as stated by Tony Watson Solicitor Law Society of Ireland.

If Robert B Marren had not deprived me the right to have my well-founded objections brought before a Judge. Marren confiscated the Department of Agriculture grants, so I was tricked into working for nothing for over 9 years minding farm animals. My widowed sister and I were also shorted €12,500 plus interest from the sale of the lands at auction, not to mention money that was deducted from my sister for cattle she never owned any cattle in her life.

If Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone had undertaken the written and verbal instructions given him though another solicitor to take proceedings against Marren and make him go before a Judge to address my valid objections instead of playing GOD in the matter.

If Tony Watson Law Society of Ireland had reprimanded Marren and Henry. Instead Watson threatened to block my email correspondence when I questioned whether Willie Penrose TD was paid for his opinion. No invoice to date has being provided for Penrose although the estate of my late Brother was charged. I very much doubt Penrose had much if anything to say for himself to the trained fraud investigator who questioned him.

If Peter D. Jones Westmeath State Solicitor (minus his penalty points) had responded to the correspondence on behalf of his client Robert B Marren. Jones threatened me not to peaceful protest outside his client Marren’s office. Coincidentally the Garda Fraud squad missed getting me home the first time they called unannounced as I was already on the road to peaceful assembly protest outside Marren and Jones offices in Mullingar.

If Linda Kirwan Solicitor from the Society of Ireland fit her purpose and reprimanded Penalty Points Jones State Solicitor for failing to answer the 20 questions I posed to him in regard to his client Robert B Marren’s administration of my late brother’s estate. Kirwan although she did send literature stating that by law a solicitor must provide a bill of costs to his client, she fails to enforce this law.

While I do understand that you as Tanaiste have no role in the investigation, prosecution or trail, I find it difficult to appreciate how the State funded Director of Prosecutions (DPP) can be considered an independent body.

Although I have no background or understanding of the common or statute laws that the DPP will use to base their decision on. I do understand what the old people meant when they said “The Law is as straight as a door jamb, it’s those that implements it thats crooked.” No man has a right to blaggard another the way them solicitors named above did me.

In the event that the DPP does not prosecute and bearing in mind the fact that solicitors generally refuse to challenge each other in cases such as mine.

What course of action is available to prevent Financial Elder Abuse??

Michael Gavin