Robert Marren Solicitor Threatens Court Application against Michael Gavin’s RIP Widowed Sister Eileen Linney

 

Marren-Glynn-22-August-2019Marren,

In response to your letter to John Glynn Solicitor dated 22nd August 2019 we will state the following and send it to your office and home address in Mullingar via Registered Post as we have done with previous correspondence which you ROBERT B MARREN have choose to IGNORE..

After Michael Gavin RIP met with you once in your office Castle Street Mullingar he was of the opinion that you were as Crooked as a dog’s hind leg,Michael often remarked that he heard the old people say that The Law is as straight as a door Jamb; it’s those that implements the Law that are CROOKED.

Although you Marren are well aware that the Law Society of Ireland advised John Glynn to step aside you continue to squander the estate assets by writing to him.

Now you  Threatens Court Application to force me to sign your form 36 and squander more estate assets.

There is an alternative for you and you clients contained in the previous correspondence sent to you and your clients in May/June 2019 copy enclosed again.

As I have advised you in previous correspondence from the date you received and have withheld funds from my widowed sister Eileen Linney and I an interest rate of 8% per Month is accruing to the benefit of our accounts plus expenses because of your failure to make good on our legitimate claim.

Here is a link to file that was sent to DPP https://goo.gl/ryaqsf

Here is copy of previous correspondence sent to you registered post and email which you Ignored.

Marren,

Why did you contact John Glynn in April 2019 re signing Land Registry Form 36 for House at Dundonnell, Taughmaconnell, Roscommon. As you are well aware your clients Kathleen O’ Keefe and Anne Sanford reported John Glynn to the Law Society of Ireland and they advised him to step aside.

My late brother Michael Gavin RIP and I responded to your previous request for our signatures on form 36 back in October 2017.

Why did you and or your clients fail to respond. (copy of the letter we sent you is included below.)

Did you hire Lawrence McManus 083 113 3608 Pettigo, Co Donegal to mediate the sale of the property at Dundonnell Taughmaconnell Roscommon?

Why did Lawrence McManus 083 113 3608 Pettigo, Co Donegal phoned me demanding that I, Eileen Linney hand over the keys to the house in Dundonnell, Taughmaconnell, Roscommon where Michael Gavin RIP lived all his life.

Lawrence McManus claims to be a mediator and told me Eileen Linney that he has a right by law to the keys and he proposes to sell the house in March 2019.

Donal Jackson from Athlone who met with Lawrence Mc Manus on my behalf formed the impression that McManus is/was a member of the IRA.

Mc Manus was expelled from Sinn Fein but we are unsure why.

In a recorded conversation between Lawrenace McManus and Derek McCabe https://youtu.be/B8dc9T94iVs Monkesland Athlone. McManus claims he has the agreement of all the family to sell the house in Dundonnell, Taughmaconell and claims he has filed the necessary paperwork with the district court. This is a lie because I Eileen Linney did not sign any agreement with Lawrence McManus nor did I ever meet with him.

We have spoken to people in Donegal namely Shauna Veronica Tynan friend to Bridget Dillon and they claim that McManus has a history of tricking the elderly out of money up there.

As it stands McManus and his son are using the farmlands in Dundonnell to graze their cattle which is strange bearing in mind that its at least a 3 hour drive from Pettigo.

A brief history of what happened.  My 2 sisters Ann Sanford and Kathleen O’Keefe reported John Glynn to law Society.   The Law Society advised John Glynn to step aside.  John Glynn continued to assist us with correspondence on our behalf (unletter Headed) to you  Marren.  When you Marren issued the distribution statement it was apparent that you favoured our sisters Ann Sanford and Kathleen O’Keefe wishes. We challenged you on a number of points and suggested that he take case back before a Judge for a decision to be made particularly how department of agriculture grants were to be distributed bearing in mind that my late brother Michael Gavin had minded the farm animals for over 9 years, and paid the associated expenses out of his own pocket.  This was a contentious issue as my brother Michael Gavin RIP had been led to believe by his two sisters all along that he would be compensated.

YOU Marren responded by threatening us that if we did not engage a solicitor, you intended to proceed and distribute the estate assets according to the statement. John Glynn spoke and wrote to Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone.   Tony Henry Tormeys solicitors failed to undertake the instructions given him by John Glynn.   Tony Henry also failed to inform us, that he would not carry out those instructions.  Therefore you Robert B Marren distributed the estate assets in isolation to my brother Michael Gavin RIP and my objections.

FOR THE RECORD. My brother was out of pocket in excess of €116,000 Department of Agriculture Grants.  Both my brother and I were shorted €12,500 EACH from Proceeds of the Land sale and a further €3,700 was deducted from me for cattle I never owned.

Our demands are the following:  That from the date that you Marren received and withheld funds from my late brother Michael Gavin RIP and I, an interest rate of 8% is accruing to our account plus expenses, because of YOUR failure to make good on our legitimate claim or take the matter back to the courts for a Judge to decide.  The above has been written to and email to YOU Marren and your State Solicitor Peter D Jones numerous times, but no reply.

There is a charge against the properties of my late brother Patrick Gavin RIP with the  Land Registry, Roscommon. You do not have my permission to sell the house until such time as my above demands are met. 

Have you Robert B Marren informed those currently using the lands Michael Myers and Paddy Myers Dundonnell Taughmaconnell and Lawrence McManus Pettigo Donegal that the lands are in dispute and were obtained fraudulently?

Have you Robert B Marren informed YOUR CLIENTS Ann Sanford Wellesley Massachusetts, Kathleen O’Keeffe Glanmire, Cork, Patrick Duffy, Philomena Duffy Davitt College, Castlebar, Noel Duffy Athlone, Kathryn Kelly Duffy Portiuncula Hospital Ballinasloe, Michael J. Harte Wellesley Massachusetts, Michelle Harte, Brenda Waters Quincy USA of the impact this matter will have on them. What will their work colleagues, neighbours, and friends have to say???

Have you Robert B Marren informed the department of Agriculture and instruct them to stop paying out grants on the Farm lands until such time as this matter is sorted?

My brother Pat Gavin died intestate in October 2005. You Robert B Marren were appointed to administer the estate of my late brother. You Marren considered the other beneficiaries to be your clients, you favoured their wishes, followed their instructions and ignored my brother Michael Gavin RIP and my objections and that was the opinion from by Tony Watson from Law Society Ireland.

We did attempt to retain a solicitor Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone, however he did NOT undertake the instructions given him through John Glynn and therefore YOU Marren closed the estate in isolation to our objections.

FOR THE RECORD. My brother Michael Gavin RIP was out of pocket in excess of €116,000 Department of Agriculture Grants.  Both my brother and I were shorted €12,500 EACH from Proceeds of the Land sale and a further €3,700 was deducted from me for cattle I never owned.

My demands remain the same from the date Robert B Marren received and withheld funds from my deceased brother Michael Gavin and I an interest rate of 8% per Month is accruing to the benefit of our accounts plus expenses because of Robert B Marrens failure to make good on our legitimate claim.

Here is the exact letter that was sent to you by my late brother Michael Gavin RIP and I when we responded to your previous request for our signatures on form 36 back in October 2017

Dear Mr Marren,

In response to your letter dated 24th October, 2017.

RE: House at Taughmaconnell

Paragraph 1 of your letter Mr. Marren you stated:

I refer to your recent correspondence regarding the above. I have received correspondence from Patrick Hogan & Company Solicitors on your behalf also.

My Response:

The recent correspondence you received from me personally contained 10 questions. Only the first 2 questions were in relation to “Houses at Taughmaconnell” Co. Roscommon.

I would be most grateful if you would stop coercing me into retaining a Solicitor and respond to each of my 10 questions in order.

You Robert Marren have NOT dealt with any of the issues raised in my letter in your response or your “previous correspondence” and I propose to pursue you vigorously until the matters are resolved to my satisfaction.

Paragraph 2 of your letter Mr. Marren you stated:

The Position is that Application is being made in the Land Registry to register the beneficiaries as owners of the house in which you currently reside, which belonged to your late brother Patrick Gavin deceased. I have circulated Land Registry Forms 36 which is required to be signed by each of the beneficiaries in order to achieve this. I forwarded a form for a signature by you to your Solicitor, whom you should consult in relation thereto. The registration of the beneficiaries as owners of the property does not affect your Right of Residence. You will still be entitled to reside there by law.

My Response

The above paragraph refers to Folio 9544F my current home and where I have lived most of my life with my brother Pat Gavin who died in October 2005 over 12 years ago.

I have a number of questions I would like you to answer with regard to the above 2nd paragraph of your letter Mr Robert B Marren.

  1. Why has it taken until now for you Robert B Marren to make application to Land Registry to register the beneficiaries as owners of the house in which I currently reside?
  2. Why did you LIE Robert B Marren to me in previous correspondence when you stated you had finished administrating the estate?
  3. Who Robert B Marren requires all the beneficiaries to sign Land Registry Forms 36?
  4. Why don’t you do the right thing and circulate a form requiring the beneficiaries to return what they ROBBED from me?
  5. Who is my Solicitor Robert B Marren?
  • John Glynn was asked to step aside by the Law Society of Ireland.
  • Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone failed to undertake instructions.
  • Martin Egan informed me that because you are the son in law of Aidan O’Carroll I will not get representation in the midlands.
  • Barristers are looking for €30,000 cash upfront to sue you.

 

Paragraph 3 of your letter Mr. Marren you stated:

In relation to your query regarding the lands comprised in Folio RN36155F. Your Solicitor will explain that this piece of ground that was registered in the names of the original Administrators. When I was appointed Administrator by the High Court, I then registered the property in my name as Administrator. This piece of ground will also be registered in the names of the beneficiaries.

My Response

The above paragraph refers to Folio 36155F old historical home where I was born and reared.

A Solicitor has already explained irregularities to me with regard to Folio 36155F

 

I have a number of questions I would like you to answer with regard to the above 3rd  paragraph  of your letter Mr Robert B Marren.

 

  1. Why did you Robert B Marren registered Folio 36155F in your name as Administrator?
  2. Why was Folio 36155F excluded from the land sale?
  3. According to the Land Registry in Roscommon Folio 36155F was recently registered in the names of the beneficiaries. Why was/am I not required to complete FORM 36 for the Folio 36155F but I am required for Folio 9544F??

 

Paragraph 4 of your letter Mr. Marren you stated:

This is the final step in the administration of your late brother’s Estate and I hope to complete this as soon as all the Land Registry forms are signed by the beneficiaries to enable me proceed. Until I receive the necessary documentation duly signed, I cannot finalize matters.

My response

I suggest you chew on a recent statement made by an informed individual obviously familiar with my case of Financial Elder Abuse.

The feeling of injustice, of being wronged, can eat away at a man’s soul. It seems too that it is invariably the poor man who is on the receiving end: he has not the wherewithal either to take on the rich and privileged wrong-doers. No there is no justice for the poor. Law was after all invented in the ancient world by the rich and powerful specifically to oppress the poor… The poor wronged man will surely carry his sense of injustice with him into the grave. And there is not a thing he can do about it. ~ peter robinson

There is no doubt that I Michael Gavin will carry my sense of injustice with me into the grave. However how many generations of those rich and privileged wrong-doers will be haunted by their ancestral shame?

Paragraph 5 of your letter Mr. Marren you stated:

The other issues that you raised in your letter have been dealt with in previous correspondence and I do not propose to revisit the matters. The administration has been completed, save for the final step and I would be obliged if you would forward to me the documentation duly signed to enable me proceed.

My Response

No that is another LIE Robert B Marren the 10 questions below remain unanswered. I would be much obliged if you and the beneficiaries would return what you ROBBED from me.

Questions you refuse to answer.

Question 1

Re Folio RN36155F the old historical home where I was born and reared.

  1. Who authorised you Mr. Robert B Marren to register yourself as full owner?
  2. Who authorised you Mr. Robert B Marren to make application to Roscommon Land Registration Authority for applicants Ann Sanford Wellesley Massachusetts, Kathleen O’Keeffe Glanmire, Cork, Eileen Linney, Michael Gavin, Patrick Duffy, Philomena Duffy, Noel Duffy, Kathryn Kelly, Michael J. Harte, Michelle Harte, Brenda Waters as owners of Folio RN36155F.
  3. I was not required to complete FORM 36 for the above registration. WHY?

Question 2

Re Folio 9544F the home where I currently reside.

  1. Why are you a coercing me again to engage a solicitor at my expense to complete FORM 36.
  2. Why has it taken until now for you Mr. Robert B. Marren to deal with this vexatious issue bearing in mind that my brother Pat Gavin died in October 2005 over 12 years ago.
  3. Will I still be entitled to reside in my home as per my fathers will?

Question 3

Who authorised you Mr. Robert B. Marren to favour the wishes of my 2 devious and spiteful sisters Ann Sanford and Kathleen O’Keefe. According to Tony Watson of the Law Society of Ireland you followed their clear instructions. What about my valid objections Marren?

Question 4

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to distribute the estate assets speedily over the Christmas period 2014 in the knowledge that myself and my sister Eileen Linney were actively attempting to retain a solicitor (Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone) to act on our behalf to prevent you closing. Why didn’t you do the right thing and take the case back before a judge as I instructed you to do.

Question 5

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to Delay making the decision regarding my share in the farming profits and rightful share of the grant monies received from the Department of Agriculture until the very end with the draft distribution account that contained countless errors on 18th September, 2014?

Question 6

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar to make a decision in March 2013 to accept my claim to owning half the livestock and all the sheep?

But yet for no logical reason you refused to award me the net amount €116,789.11 due to me out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing my ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, which was also sent to you Mr. Robert Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar on the 5th of December, 2015 for your consideration.

Question 7

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to award me Elderly Michael Gavin and my widowed sister €12,500 plus interest less than what we were entitled to? Who authorised you to hold on to the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years for no good reason?

Question 8

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren NOT to provide your detailed bill of costs as requested numerous times?

Question 9

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to hire your own personal accountant Damien Hannigan & Company Limited Chartered Accountant, Mullingar. Why was he hired against the explicate wishes of Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney to oversee the accounts of Catherine O’Conner?

Damien Hannigan charged an excessive fee of €8,751.45 which is considered to be extremely expensive and an unnecessary expe++nse. Although he was hired to oversee the accounts his fee is in excess of Catherine O’Conner’s fee.

Why do you Robert B. Marren refused to provide the correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25.”

Question 10

Who authorised you Robert B. Marren to seek William Penrose B.L opinion.  Despite our numerous written requests No Invoice for William Penrose B.L. or explanation of why his opinion was sought. Did you pay Willie Penrose and what for?

The Estate was charged €1,230 for Willie Penrose’s opinion but no invoice was provided despite repeated persistent written requests. We were informed that Willie Penrose TD BL has refused to the investigating Garda a statement in relation to this matter.

As I have advised you in previous correspondence from the date you received and have withheld funds from my widowed sister Eileen Linney and I an interest rate of 8% per Month is accruing to the benefit of our accounts plus expenses because of your failure to make good on our legitimate claim.

Here is a link to file that was sent to DPP https://goo.gl/ryaqsf

Your Sincerely,

Eileen Linney

 

 

Peter D Jones State Solicitor Mullingar Threatened Michael Gavin RIP

peterdjones-4

Peter D Jones State Solicitor Mullingar Threatens 84 Yr Old

#Peter D Jones of Peter D Jones & Co #Solicitors #Mullingar why do you act for #RobertBMarren #Solicitor Mullingar? Surly Mr. Marren a solicitor of the highest integrity and respected as an honest and upright person should be able to stand up and act for himself against 84 year Old Elderly Michael Gavin of limited means as you so put it above in your April fools letter.

The Justice for Michael Gavin group would disagree with you, that the PEACEFUL protests they are conducting in relation to Mr. Marren’s functions as administrator / solicitor are unwarranted and unfair.

We do not agree with your statement that every opportunity was afforded prior to the distribution of the estate to challenge him in relation to his intention to distribute the estate in accordance with the rules of intestacy.

As far as we are concerned if Mr. Robert B. Marren did his job as appointed by the #HighCourt, there would be no need to challenge him in the first place. However after numerous attempts were made to put a halt to Mr. Marren distribution of the estate assets in isolation to well found objections, Mr. Marren your client threatened elderly Michael Gavin and widowed sister Eileen Linney.

Mr. Marren Solicitor refused to pay out Michael Gavin and his sister Eileen Linneys share of the proceeds from the land sale despite the fact that he had same in his possession for nearly 2 years.

He went on to threaten them that he intended to distribute the Estate Assets if they did not hire a Solicitor to issue proceedings to prevent him doing so despite their founded objections, namely €116,789.11 compensation for minding the animals for 9 years and the amount awarded to each for the land sale was short €12,500 each plus interest from the time Mr. Marren Received the funds.

Instructions were given to #TonyHenry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone through their family Solicitor John Glynn Patrick Hogan & Co. Ballinasloe, to engage with Mr. Robert Marren on their behalf. However Tony Henry, Tormeys Solicitor did not undertake these instructions, nor did he inform them. So Michael and Eileen did not realize what had happened until the deficient checks arrived in the post.correct

What signage are you referring to that has been placed on poles around Mullingar which is totally incorrect unfair and untrue?

Peter-Jones-Mike-Gavin-01-04-2016-image-1

Mr. Peter D Jones of Peter D Jones & Co Solicitors Mullingar, why did your client Robert B. Marren

  • Deprives an elderly farmer  the grant money’s paid down from the Dept. of Agriculture. John Glynn Solicitor estimated Michael is owed over €116,000 for 9 years minding the farm Animals?
  • holds onto the funds from the land sale for nearly 2 years, and then finally awarded to Michael Gavin and his sister €12,500 plus interest less than what we were each entitled to ?
  • Not provide an invoice for Willie Penrose’s opinion when the estate was charged for same?
  •  Squander the estate assets and hire an additional accountant at a cost of €8,751.45 to the estate
  • not provide a “detailed bill of costs” for his fee of €40,892.53 he awarded to himself.
  • not provided a bill of costs for T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone, paid an amount of €38,941 a year prior to closing. They brought Mike to the High Court 3 days attempting to sell the roof over his head.
  • not seek a court order to determine how the estate should be administered when their were well founded objections
  • follow the instructions of Katheen O’Keefe and Anne Sanford and treat them as his clients, when in fact they were beneficiaries of the Estate the same as Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney?

We take exception to your threatening tone of your letter and your remark that “Mr. Michael Gavin is an elderly man and no less than anybody else is a person of limited means”. We have every right to peaceful protest outside Mr. Robert B. Marren’s Office and your office for that matter Mr. Peter D. Jones State Solicitor and we will continue to do so until justice is served.

Why have you  and Mr. Marren waited until now to object to our campaign for justice. We wrote to your client on  11/07/2015 and informed him that

“In the event that the Law Society of Ireland does not accept that our 8 complaints of inadequate professional services, alleged over charging and misconduct, warrant investigation we have every intention of referring this matter to the independent Adjudicator, the solicitors disciplinary tribunal Dublin , An Garda Síochána and the Health Service Executive HSE. Although this whole matter is a source of embarrassment to us, we will have no hesitation in disclosing same in the public domain, as it is our belief that the general public have a right to be made aware of the events that took place and let them judge for themselves based on the true facts.

Peter D. Jones of Peter D. Jones & Co Solicitors Mullingar your client Mr. Robert Marren Solicitor has no one to blame but himself and his aroganct reluctance to respond to our correspondence.

Your client Mr. Robert B. Marren  may also recall a letter was also sent to your office in Mullingar on 17TH of June 2015 stating the following;

“I take issue with your reluctance to provide a detailed breakdown of how the figure of €40,892.53 representing fees paid to Robert Marren & Co. were arrived at. I also feel I am entitled to a breakdown of all other fees paid out of the Estate funds and who was paid what at closing.

I also take issue with your persistent reluctance to provide the following

Bill of Cost for T & N McLynn, Solicitors, Athlone

Correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25.

Invoice for William Penrose B.L. or explanation of why his opinion was sought.

Invoice for John Dolan Auctioneer and breakdown of the handsome fee he was paid.

Answer to “has John Glynn, Hogan & Co. Ballinasloe been paid to date, and if not why not”?

Answer to “has John Glynn, Hogan & Co. Ballinasloe been paid to date, and if not why not”?

Any outstanding bills.”

We have yet to receive a response to that letter above which we sent register post notwithstanding the fact that these questions were posed to you in previous correspondence numerous times prior and regardless we have a right to be furnished with copies of same. Your client Mr. Robert Marren will note that points 5 and 6 of that letter of 17TH of June 2015, are one in the same and we underlined if not why not”? in an effort to draw his attention to same which apparently he had yet to do.

Why were we not provided with a  Bill of Cost for T & N McLynn, Solicitors, Athlone who we were informed was paid their handsome amount of €38,941.00  approximately a year prior to your finalised distribution during the Christmas period 2014-2015.

When exactly was T & N McLynn, Solicitors, Athlone paid and why were they paid in advance of the finalised distribution while you refused to pay our 1/6 share of the land from auction or fees to Patrick Hogan & Co.??

Mr. Marren your client did not seek our approval for T & N McLynn, Solicitors bill nor did he request if we objected to same after they represented the other side beneficiaries who put the Estate of our late brother Patrick Gavin to enormous legal expense with their High Court Special Summons where they sought to sell the roof over Michael Gavin’s head among other things.

“By notices in writing Kathleen ‘OKeefe, and Mary Theresa Harte have confirmed their desire to have the house and lands of the estate sold. Nicholas Duffy and his four children have also confirmed that they desire to have the property sold. It is also the wish of the Plaintiff that the property be sold.”

Bearing in mind that the beneficiaries namely Anne Sanford, Kathleen O’Keefe, Mike Harte, Brenda Harte Waters, Michelle Harte, Philomena Duffy, Patrick Duffy, Catherine Duffy and Noel Duffy and their Solicitor T & N McLynn were well aware that Michael Gavin was entitled to live in the home for the rest of his days per his father’s will which they were all furnished with a copy of.

As we recall we were required to attend the high court on 3 separate days, the first of which none of the beneficiaries attended. On the second day we were informed by our barrister Donal Keane B.L. that they were in another room arguing amongst themselves, and then finally we got before the judge on the third day.

This is just one of the numerous examples of their vengeful, spiteful behaviour where they squandered the Estate assets. Not to mention the inconvenience, and additional expenses that were incurred to hire a man to mind the “Estate Animals” for 3 days, there was no mention of any funds to cover that cost in your finalised distribution.

On another occasion which we kept your client Mr.Marren update on, we recall one of the beneficiaries #KathleenOKeefe rushed us into signing a lease agreement on 27th August, 2014 without providing us an opportunity to read over same carefully or to consider the matter. Consequently we were forced to get legal advice in order to amend a number of the conditions including Michael Gavin’s agreement to “having fully restored the lands to grassland by ploughing and reseeding by no later than the 31st of July 2015.” Lands that were never used for tillage, and even if they were who would commit to a short term 1 year lease with that condition.

This appears underhanded to us and highlights the inadequate professional service provided by their Solicitor T&N McLynn, Athlone. It is not of a quality that could reasonably be expected of a solicitor and served no purpose other than to force us to incur additional unnecessary expenses for legal advice to draft letters in response to the lease agreement Kathleen O’Keefe tricked me Michael Gavin into signing.

Your client Mr. Marren has yet to provided the correct invoice for Catherine O’Conner. Her invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25.

Your client Mr. Robert B. Marren did not seek our approval for seeking #WilliamPenrose B.L opinionNo Invoice for William Penrose B.L. or explanation of why his opinion was sought.

Your client did not seek our approval for #JohnDolanAuctioneerNo Invoice for John Dolan Auctioneer and breakdown of the fee he was paid was provided to us to date.  As we recall the auctioneer John Dolan did advertise the auction extensively and I recall full and half page ads appeared in the local newspapers.  We would argue that based on the amount of interest and bids made at the auction that these ads served no purpose other than to promote John Dolans Auctioneering service as a whole. To be honest a free mention in the local parish newsletter would have sufficed.

Your client did not seek our approval for Damien Hannigan & Company Limited Chartered Accountant, Mullingar. Why was he hired against our explicate wishes to oversee the accounts of Catherine O’Conner. He charged in my opinion an excessive fee of €8,751.45 which we consider to be extremely expensive and an unnecessary expense.  Although he was hired to oversee the accounts his fee is in excess of Catherine O’Conner’s fee. John Glynn, Solicitor, Patrick Hogan & Co. did not put the Estate to the additional expense of hiring an additional Accountant so it begs the question why did your client Mr Robert B. Marren?

It would appear that there is a personal axe to grind between your client Robert Marren and John Glynn, Solicitor, Patrick Hogan & Co. and your client had no business drawing us into his own personal battles between members of his own profession.

beneficiaries-11

Mr. Peter D. Jones of Peter D. Jones & Co Solicitors Mullingar, in our opinion it would be more befitting of your client to write to each of the beneficiaries namely #AnneSanford, #Wellesley, #Massachusetts USA, Kathleen O’Keefe, #Glanmire, Cork, Mike Harte, Wellesley Massachusetts USA, Brenda Harte Waters Quincy, Mass USA, Michelle Harte Wellesley Massachusetts USA, Philomena Duffy Davitt College Castlebar Mayo, Patrick Duffy, Kilrush, Clare, Catherine Kelly Duffy, Portceuncilla hospital Ballinasloe and Noel Duffy, Athlone, as I have done  and claw back the monies owed to us.

They cannot on the one hand expect to receive the monies from the sale of my late brother Pat Gavin’s livestock together with the gross payments received from the Department of Agriculture, without incurring any expense for the minding, looking after and caring for the animals down through the years.

Catherine O’Conner’s Account Summary 24/02/2012 shows that throughout the entire farming period between 2005 and 2012 the cattle sales came to a figure of €46,589 and the expenses came to a figure of €45,918. Accordingly, the expenses in running the farm were almost equal to the proceeds of sale of livestock. Therefore the profit from the farming operation represented the monies received each year from the Department of Agriculture under the single Payment Scheme, the Disadvantaged Area Scheme and any other Schemes of the Department of Agriculture, less any income tax payable to the state arising out of the farming operation.

We and those we have spoken to in relation to this matter FAIL to see the logic to your reluctance Mr. Robert Marren to see reason in this matter, how do you expect a person to labour for free for 9 years at their own expense and pay vets fees and fodder to fatten cattle so that those THAT DO NOTHING can reap the rewards of the GROSS profits. I Michael Gavin believe with every bone in my body that I am entitled to be paid for the work done and services rendered and monies expended by me in looking after my brother’s livestock from the time my brother died up to the time the animals were sold, this you will appreciate involved the daily herding and looking after the animals to include feeding of the animals in Winter months to include purchase of food stuffs and discharging vets fees etc.

By denying me Michael Gavin a half share in the profits it means that Michael Gavin WAS WORKING FOR NOTHING over the years in question from October, 2005 through to 2013. This is totally unjust and totally unacceptable to us.

We will not accept the present situation which is totally unfair and leaves Michael Gavin without any compensation whatsoever for the time and trouble in looking after the animals on behalf of the estate and also deprives Michael Gavin of any profit he may have earned in the rearing and looking after his own animals.

The detailed breakdown of the net amount €116,789.11 due to Michael Gavin out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing his ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, was  sent to your client Mr. Marren, Solicitor, on the 5th of December, 2015 for his consideration. You will note that all that Michael Gavin is looking for is his fair share of the profits in the running of the farm and fair compensation for the work Michael Gavin did in looking after the animals.

It would appear that your client Mr. Robert Marren delayed making the decision regarding Michael Gavin’s share in the farming profits and rightful share of the grant monies received from the Department of Agriculture until the very end with the draft distribution account that contained countless errors on 18th September, 2014. Michael Gavin was lied to countless times and led to believe that he would be refunded at closing by some of the beneficiaries.

13094132_301138173550622_8337003707737119246_n

Why did your client Mr. Robert Marren make a decision around March 2013 to accept Michael Gavin’s claim to owning half the livestock and all the sheep? But yet for no logical reason refused to award him the net amount €116,789.11 due to Michael Gavin out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing my ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, which was also sent to your client on the 5th of December, 2015 for his consideration. There is no good reason why your client took advantage of Michael Gavin’s good nature and delayed his decision in this matter until the end.

Your client would have received a letter from Michael Gavin on 5th December, 2014 stating;

“If a fair allowance is not made on an agreed basis, I will not give my consent to any distribution account prepared by you. Similarly, my sisters will also have to agree before a distribution account can be finalised and a distribution effected. Accordingly you as Administrator will be unable to distribute the estate unless you can procure agreement between us and, if this agreement is not forthcoming, I am advised the only way you, as Administrator, can be protected is to go back into Court and get a Court Order directing how the estate can be distributed.

However your client Mr. Marren passed the book to us and demanded court proceedings to prevent the distribution in a short space of time over the Christmas period 2014-2015.

We believe that your client Mr. Robert Marren should NOT have finalised the distribution without addressing our objections, and it appears he did same to avoid paying our €82,500 1/6 share of the land from action in isolation to the rest of the estate.

While it would appear that these are matters that can only be dealt with by the court if they cannot be resolved by agreement I believe it should be the Administrator who goes back into Court to get a Court Order directing how the estate can be distributed not the ELDERLY BENEFICIARIES.

It would also appear that Mr. Henry of Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone facilitated your client Mr. Marren by not phoning  him or writing him immediately as requested by John Glynn Solicitor, (14/01/2015 John Glynn Patrick Hogan & Co. to Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone requesting him to ring and write a short letter to Mr. Marren immediately confirming that he would act in the matter in response to Marren’s threat to effect a distribution of the Estate.) nor did Mr. Henry of Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone inform us, so that we could engage another Solicitor to act on  behalf of Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney.

We have difficulty understanding why Mr. Henry of Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone failed to respond to correspondence, including correspondence that was crucial and significant to us.

At a subsequent meeting with Mr. Henry after your closing he estimated that court proceedings to sue you could take up to 3 years with fees in the region of €60,000 to €100,000, and he suggested that I Michael Gavin should take my age (83) into consideration.

It would appear you allowed confusion to arise in relation to the exact disbursement of funds and showed a complete disregard for the interests of the beneficiaries, whom you, Mr. Robert Marren a Solicitor, knew to be ELDERLY, and by your conduct is depriving two of the ELDERLY beneficiaries, of the enjoyment of their share in the estate. You have also forced Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney to incur additional unnecessary expenses in drafting documents and letters time and time again to prove their claim.

Bones of Contention

With Mr. Robert B. Marren Solicitor Mullingar

  1. Allowed confusion to arise in relation to the exact disbursement of funds held by him;
  2. Grossly delayed, without reasonable explanation, the administration of the estate, the deceased person having died in 2005 some ten years ago;
  3. Showed a complete disregard for the interests of the beneficiaries, whom Mr. Marren, Solicitor, knew to be elderly, and by his conduct is depriving two of the beneficiaries, of the enjoyment of their share in the estate;
  4. Provided an inadequate professional service and it is not of a quality that could reasonably be expected of a solicitor. There is no good reason why Mr Marren did not “bite the bullet” and pay over the full €82,500 when he received the funds way back on 27th of May 2013.
  5. Being reluctant to resolve the issue in isolation to the rest of the Estate;
  6. Not provided the detailed bill of costs to include a detailed breakdown of how the figure of €40,892.53 representing fees paid to Robert Marren & Co. were arrived at. The legal and auctioneering fees are excessive, and Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney should not be charged for same as the beneficiaries on the other side agreed to waive them. 05/07/13 Marron to Gavin and Linney enclosing copy letter dated 3rd of July, 2013 from T & N McLynn;
  7. Breached the following regulation of the solicitors’ account regulations, 2001: • Regulation 4(2): by failing without delay to pay monies held or controlled by them in respect of outlays not yet disbursed into client account and failing to treat such monies in all respects as client money;
  8. Breached the following regulation of the solicitors’ account regulations, 2001: Regulation 5: by holding monies to which they were beneficially entitled in a client account for longer than three months in respect of outlays already disbursed, or which should have been the subject matter of a bill of costs furnished to the client concerned;
  9. Brought the solicitors profession into disrepute;
  10. Denied Michael Gavin a share in the farming profits, to the extent that Michael Gavin was working for nothing over the 9 years in question from October, 2005 through to 2013;
  11. Provided an inadequate professional service and it is not of a quality that could reasonably be expected of a solicitor with regards to the explanation he provides to explain how he arrived at his decision to award the moneys received from the sale of Pat Gavin’s livestock together with the Gross payments received from the Department of Agriculture without deducting any expense for the minding, looking after, feeding and caring for the animals for the nine years from 2005 to 2014;
  12. Delayed making the decision regarding Michael Gavin’s share in the farming profits and rightful share of the grant monies received from the Department of Agriculture until the very end with the draft distribution account that contained countless errors on 18th September, 2014. Michael Gavin was lied to and led to believe that he would be refunded at closing by some of the beneficiaries. Why did Mr. Marren make a decision around March 2013 to accept Michael Gavin’s claim to owning half the livestock and all the sheep? But yet for no logical reason refuses to award him the net amount €116,789.11 due to him out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing my ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, which was also sent to Mr. Marren, Solicitor, on the 5th of December, 2015 for his consideration. There is no good reason why he took advantage of Michael Gavin’s good nature and delayed his decision in this matter until the end;
  13. Squandered the Estate assets by hiring an additional accountant against my wishes at a cost of €8,751.45;
  14. Accounting mistakes and lack of clarity;
  15. Forced elderly Michael Gavin and widowed Eileen Linney to incur additional unnecessary expenses in drafting documents and letters time and time again to prove their claim;
  16. Not furnished a detailed statement of all the legal costs to his client. Under Section 68 of the Solicitors (Amendment) Act, 1994 provides for charges to clients. Under these provisions a solicitor should furnish a detailed statement of all the legal costs to his client;
  17. Not furnished a copy of Solicitor T & N McLynn’s Bill of Costs for the handsome fee of €38,941.00;
  18. Provided incorrect invoice for Catherine O’Conner Accountant. Catherine O’Conner’s invoice states Total Amount Due €584.25 while Cash Account dated 18th July, 2014 “Fees paid to Catherine O’ Connor €6,857.25;
  19. Not provided an invoice for William Penrose B.L. or explanation of why his opinion was sought for €1,230.00;
  20. Not provided an invoice for John Dolan Auctioneer and breakdown of the fee he was paid. Auctioneer John Dolan did advertise the auction extensively with full and half page ads in the local newspapers. However based on the amount of interest and bids made at the auction, these ads served no purpose other than to promote John Dolans Auctioneering service as a whole. A free mention in the local parish newsletter would have sufficed.

History of the case

Michael Gavin and his brother Pat lived together all their lives over 70 years in their humble home Dundonnell, Taughmaconnell in south Roscommon. After Pat died intestate, Michael Gavin continued farming and caring for the farm animals as he had always done.

The Department of Agriculture appointed Michael Gavin herd keeper for the animals after his brother’s death. Robert Marren Solicitor refused to award Michael compensation from the grant moneys paid down from the department.

If Michael Gavin did not continue the farming of the land then the estate would not be entitled to claim the Entitlements.

Michael Gavin offered to buy the farm from the next of kin beneficiaries, but they would agree to nothing and matters came to a head when under the guidance of Tony McLynn Solicitor Athlone they summoned Michael to the High Court in Dublin in an effort to sell the house along with the farm, making out that they would have difficulty selling the farm on its own. Their Solicitor #Tony McLynn of T&N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone was well aware that Michael had a right to reside in the family home for the rest of my days as per my fathers will, but that did not prevent them squandering the Estate Assets. Three days in total were spent in the High court, the first of which they did not attend, the second they spent in a waiting room arguing among themselves and on the phone to other beneficiaries in the United States of America. Finally on the third day the Judge refused their request to sell the roof over his head.

The High Court appointed Robert Marren Solictor, Mullingar administrator for the estate. Subsequently Michael Gavin and his sister Eileen Linney had one and only one meeting with Mr. Robert Marren Solicitor at his office located on Castle Street Mullingar, at which he enquired if they had their wills made. He informed them he intended to hire an additional accountant to oversee the accounts. Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney profusely objected to this and told him it was an unnecessary expense for the estate, but he bulldozed ahead regardless.

The issue of non-payment of grants from the Department of Agriculture to Michael Gavin the appointed herd keeper eat up many a letter and despite the fact that 2 of his estranged sisters Anne Sanford, Wellesley, Mass USA & Kathleen O’Keefe, Glanmire, Cork promised to buy feed stuffs and also promised that he would be reimbursed at closing. Michael never got a cent and in essence he was forced to use my old age pension and savings to feed the animals that would have starved otherwise for 9 years. They had no objection to accepting the gross payments from the sale of the animals, and although Mr Marren “made a decision” to finally accept his claim to owning half of the cattle and all of the sheep he could not see the logic to paying out the grant monies associated with same.

The beneficiaries failed to accept that Michael Gavin is entitled to half the farming profits (i.e. half the net proceeds of the Department of Agriculture Grants from 2005-2013 inclusive, after deduction of Income Tax paid in respect of the joint farming operation) and/or in the alternative, fair compensation for work done and services rendered by me in looking after the deceased’s animals over the period.

How can the estate expect to have it both ways? Michael Gavin should be awarded either the grant monies paid by the Department of Agriculture for the nine years he looked after all the animals, or in the alternative Michael should be paid reasonable farm labours wages and refunds for the expenses incurred in running the farm as appointed herd keeper by the Department of Agriculture.

Anne Sanford, Kathleen O’Keefe and the next of kin namely Mike Harte, Brenda Harte Waters, Michelle Harte, Philomena Duffy, Patrick Duffy, Catherine Duffy Kelly and Noel Duffy cannot have it both ways. They cannot on the one hand expect to receive the monies from the sale of my late brother Pat Gavin’s livestock together with the gross payments received from the Department of Agriculture, without incurring any expense for the minding, looking after and caring for the animals down through the years.

Catherine O’Conner’s Account Summary 24/02/2012 shows that throughout the entire farming period between 2005 and 2012 the cattle sales came to a figure of €46,589 and the expenses came to a figure of €45,918. Accordingly, the expenses in running the farm were almost equal to the proceeds of sale of livestock. Therefore the profit from the farming operation represented the monies received each year from the Department of Agriculture under the single Payment Scheme, the Disadvantaged Area Scheme and any other Schemes of the Department of Agriculture, less any income tax payable to the state arising out of the farming operation.

Those we have spoken to in relation to this matter FAIL to see the logic to the beneficiaries reluctance to see reason in this matter, how do they expect Michael Gavin to labour for free for 9 years at his own expense and pay vets fees and fodder to fatten cattle so that those that do nothing can reap the rewards of the GROSS profits. Michael Gavin believes with every bone in his body that he is entitled to be paid for the work done and services rendered and monies expended by him in looking after his brother’s livestock from the time my brother died up to the time the animals were sold, this you will appreciate involved the daily herding and looking after the animals to include feeding of the animals in Winter months to include purchase of food stuffs and discharging vets fees etc.

By denying Michael Gavin a half share in the profits it means that Michael Gavin WAS WORKING FOR NOTHING over the years in question from October, 2005 through to 2013. This is totally unjust and totally unacceptable.

Michael Gavin will not accept the present situation which is totally unfair and leaves him without any compensation whatsoever for his time and trouble in looking after the animals on behalf of the estate and also deprives Michael Gavin of any profit he may have earned in the rearing and looking after his own animals.

Please find enclosed a detailed breakdown of the net amount €116,789.11 due to Michael Gavin out of the Single Payment Entitlements representing his ½ share in the profits from farming the lands, which was also sent to Mr. Robert B. Marren, Solicitor, on the 5th of December, 2015 for his consideration. You will note that all Michael is looking for is my fair share of the profits in the running of the farm and fair compensation for the work I did in looking after the animals.

The lands were eventually auctioned and Michael Gavins 2 estranged sisters Anne Sanford, Wellesley, Mass USA & Kathleen O’Keefe, Glanmire, Cork placed the winning bid, however did not close in the required 30 day time frame. The 2 sisters got the consent from the remaining next of kin to waive their share, so they were required to hand over just 1/3 of the purchase money with the agreed condition that they would cover the expenses associated with the Property Auction. They visited with Michael twice and requested that he buy the property of them and then suggested they would put the land up for sale but never did.

Mr. Marren Solicitor refused to pay out Michael Gavin and his sister Eileen Linneys share of the proceeds from the land sale despite the fact that he had same in his possession for nearly 2 years. He went on to threaten them that he intended to distribute the Estate Assets if they did not hire a Solicitor to issue proceedings to prevent him doing so despite their founded objections, namely €116,789.11 compensation for minding the animals for 9 years and the amount awarded to each for the land sale was short €12,500 each plus interest from the time Mr. Marren Received the funds.

Instructions were given to Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone through their family Solicitor John Glynn Patrick Hogan & Co. Ballinasloe, to engage with Mr. Robert Marren on their behalf. However Tony Henry, Tormeys Solicitor did not undertake these instructions, nor did he inform them. So Michael and Eileen did not realize what had happened until the deficient checks arrived in the post.

Michael and Eileen met with Mr. Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone, some 2 weeks after, however he saw no fault in what he done or failed to do for that matter. He suggested they could engage him to sue Mr. Marren at a cost of up to €100,000, 3 years in court and advised Michael to take his age of 83 years into consideration.

Complaints were made to the Law Society of Ireland with regard to Mr Robert Marrens Administration of the Estate and Mr. Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Failure to undertake explicit instructions. Needless to say no fault was found. Then Tony Henry had a cheek to scribe the letter he did to Eileen Linney a defenceless widow. The letter arrived the day before the letter from the Independent Adjudicator’s who, no surprise found no fault in the manner in which the Law Society of Ireland dealt with the complaints made. Begs the question how come Henry knew before they did and why did he not act as speedily to undertake the instructions given him on their behalf originally?

Michael and Eileen were later informed that Robert Marren refused to pay John Glynn, Solicitor, Patrick Hogan & Co. until they stopped threatening him as he puts it by reporting him to the Law Society of Ireland. Also an activist via social media told them that Willie Penrose TD BL stated he had not received his payment from Robert Marren, Solicitor, Mullingar. When this was reported to the Law Society they threatened to block further emails.

Peter D Jones State Solicitor PENALTY POINTS

peterdjones

THE STATE Solicitor for Westmeath, Peter Jones, has avoided a possible total of eight penalty points being added to his driver’s licence because points were either terminated, court summonses were not served on him, or on one occasion, a case against him was struck out. The penalty points related to four separate occasions in which Jones was recorded as speeding on dates in 2011 and 2012.
Goldhawk has learned that in January 2011, Jones was recorded as speeding (doing 103 km/h in an 80 km/h zone) at the Chapelizod bypass in Dublin. He was liable to receive two points on his licence but the case against him was struck out in Dublin District Court. On 14 January 2012, at 4.36pm, Jones was once again recorded as speeding (doing 90 km/h in an 80 km/h zone) at Tullamore, Co Offaly, for which he was liable to receive two penalty points. However, those points were terminated. The reason given for the termination was that Jones was apparently en route to court
with prosecution files in an “urgent case.”

That particular day was a Saturday, so presumably if Jones was on his way to an “urgent case”, the court hearing would have been an emergency sitting. Elsewhere, on 6 May 2012, Jones was recorded doing 102 km/h in an 80 km/h zone at the Lucan by-pass in Liffey Valley, Dublin, for which two penalty points could be added to his licence.

However, the summons for this offence – for which Jones was to appear before Dublin District Court – was never served. Finally, Jones was recorded speeding at the same area the following month – this time doing 101 km/h in an 80 km/h zone – and once again, he was liable to receive two penalty points and appear before Dublin District Court. However, yet again, a summons was not served in the case.

Goldhawk contacted Jones – who practises as Peter D Jones in Mullingar, Co Westmeath – repeatedly over the last number of weeks to seek comment in relation to the penalty points. He refused to respond to these queries and last week, Goldhawk was told by a representative in his office that the office “doesn’t deal with journalists.”

The former Irish Independent journalist Gemma O’Doherty had been planning on writing a story on Jones’s penalty points earlier this year and had submitted a number of queries to the legal eagle last May. O’Doherty was later selected for “redundancy” after she door-stepped Garda Commissioner Martin Callinan.

Peter Jones is the Fianna Fail appointed State ‪#‎Solicitor‬ for ‪#‎Westmeath‬. He is now more than 2 decades in this position. Peter Jones is a right wing conservative on moral issues and he has been against every piece of reformist referenda for decades, including the Divorce Referendum of 1995. Only a few years ago, Peter Jones had 8 PENALTY POINTS corruptly and illegally removed, a matter which appeared in the Phoenix Magazine at the time.

Peter Jones is now threatening an 83 year old farmer (see print highlighted in yellow). Is it not enough for 83 year old Mike Gavin to have been defrauded of a large sum of money by Mr. Jones’s friend and fellow Mullingar solicitor Robert Marron?

Is there nothing so low as to what the legal profession in Mullingar will stoop to? Just as you thought that they could not sink any lower by defrauding an elderly farmer, they are now threatening him.

PLEASE SHARE on your pages and
Please invite your friends.

Its time to put an end to Solicitor Financial Elder Abuse in this country!

Who Deformed Gearoid Geraghty Solicitors Ballinasloe Character?

GGDeformation

Geraghty and co

In response to the letter you sent 10 June 2019

1st paragraph of your letter

You might note that Mr. Geraghty is away on vacation, however it has come to his attention through a third party that your son has posted certain information on social media which is at best untrue.

In response we state.

All the information posted on social media by supporters of the Justice for Michael Gavin RIP are factual. Geraghty was warned both verbally and in writing that if he did NOT return Michael Gavin’s Case to Council File and Book Financial Elder Abuse he would be exposed to the general public and reported to the Law Society of Ireland not that they are fit for purpose.

GGDeformation2

2nd paragraph of your letter

Mr. Geraghty considers the information published as defamatory of him and of a third party whom ironically, we act for.

Our Response

The real irony lies in the fact that Geraghty did NOT act for his original client Michael Gavin’s Elderly widowed sister Eileen Linney. Geraghty refused to sign the Land Registry documents to place a charge lien against the properties in Dundonnell, Taughmaconnell and made little of the fact that Eileen made a special trip to Roscommon to get the forms. Geraghty said he could download the forms himself in the office.

Geaghty ignored the fact that Elderly Eileen was receiving threatening phone calls from an alleged  IRA parasite Lawrence McManus who claimed to be a court appointed mediator who intended to sell the home where she and her Late brothers Patrick and Michael Gavin RIP lived.

3rd paragraph of your letter

Please be advised that the publication of a photograph of an innocent person in a dispute between your good self and this office, is defamation of that person’s character and our Mr. Geraghty will take the instructions from that person (who is a client of his) on his return from holidays.

Our Response

QUESTION

Please provide an answer to the following question

Why are the instructions of Geraghty’s BANKSTER Client more important than the written and verbal instructions of Eileen Linney.?

Why are the instructions of Geraghty’s BANKSTER Client more important than the written and verbal instructions of Eileen Linney.?

4th paragraph of your letter

In the meantime, however, the continued existence of the posts by your son constitutes an ongoing defamation and we request that same is immediately removed.

Our Response

You may inform your bankster client that we have replaceD his photo with the following photo.

cromwell

5th paragraph of your letter

In the event that this is not done , then on Mr. Geraghty’s return to office on the 17th of June, he will pursue the matter in the appropriate legal manner.

Our Response

Question

Why did Geraghty NOT pursue the Financial Elder Abuse of Deceased Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney and the threatening phone calls, in the appropriate legal manner??

Why did Geraghty NOT persue the Financial Elder Abuse of Deceased Michael Gavin and Eileen Linney and the threatening phone calls, in the appropriate legal manner??

6th paragraph of your letter

If this course of action is necessary, it may result in further additional costs to you and we must advise that the continued existence of the posting continues to be an ongoing and further defamation of this office, Mr Geraghty and his client.

Our Response.

The appropriate charge lien were signed by another person at a cost of Twenty Euro a fraction of what your office is demanding €500 EURO to do nothing except trying to create unnecessary work TYPICAL OF PARASITES IN YOUR PROFESSION. 

Our posts are factual and will continue until your office returns Michael Gavin’s Case to Council File and Book Financial Elder Abuse Book.

7th paragrapg of your letter

We would be obliged therefore for your conformation that the post would be removed. if it is not, then the matter will be pursued through all legal channels available on Mr. Geraghty’s return from vacation.

Our Response.

We would be obliged if your office would write a letter of apology to Eileen Linney, Michael Gavin’s Elderly widowed sister and return  Michael Gavin’s Case to Council File and Book Financial Elder Abuse.

In addition to placing charge liens on the properties of my Late Brother Pat Gavin RN8137F, RN36155F, RN9544F to include the house, old house and the lands that were sold at auction to Anne Sanford and Kathleen O’keefe in Dundonell Taughmanconnell.

My instruction to you Mr Geraghty were write a strong threatening letter to those currently using the lands Michael Myers and Paddy Myers Dundonnell Taughmaconnell and Lawrence McManus Pettigo Donegal to cease from doing as the lands are in dispute and were obtained fraudulently.

Also write to the department of Agriculture and instruct them to stop paying out grants on the Farm lands until such time as this matter is sorted.

Write to Eugene Finneran, the Land registry Roscommon and the district court and inform them that they do not have my permission to sell the house at Dundonnell Taugmaconnell.

Who cares whether you consider the letters relevant, Eileen Linnen consider it to be relavent and we believe the manner in which her late brother estate was dealt with constitutes Elder Abuse and FRAUD.

So why did you not do as instructed Geraghty???

This File given to Garda Fraud
https://t.co/4aZSZCUA9N
Pdf of Financial Elder Abuse Book.
https://goo.gl/yDWCaQ

Geraghty you did none of the above NONE and now you refuse to give back documents that it was obvious from your correspondence you did not read.

You are holing Michael Gavin’s Case to Council File and book on Financial Elder Abuse book RANSOM until your fee of €500 for doing nothing is paid. 

In fact if we had listened to you Mc Manus may have sold the property by now.

Geraghty you and your office may want to take into consideration that we are not your everyday humble peasant farmers.

Michael Gavin RIP was a founding member of the ACT Anti Corruption Taskforce and involved in numerous other peaceful activist groups. We will leave no stone unturned until justice is served.

Run along now to your sissies with the white wigs.

Have a Nice Day

The law is as straight a door Jamb, Its those that implements the Law that are crooked.

I need your Support with my fight for Justice against Elder Abuse

Sign the petition
Please Support Michael Gavin Elderly 83 Year Old Irish Farmer by Signing Petition
Please find details of letter Mr. Henry of Tormey Solicitors sent to my Elder Sister Eileen Linney
This is totally unacceptable to us. It is not of the quality that could reasonably be expected of a Solicitor and resembles the act of a cowardly bully picking on a defenseless Elderly widow seeking Justice as the result of his reluctance to undertake a simple basic yet crucial instruction, namely to phone and write Mr. Robert Marren immediately.
Our Family Solicitor called Eileen 12/08/2015 and said Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone was on the Phone to him whingeing that we are exposing his letter in the public domain.
Well what else can we do when
Tony Henry of Tormeys Solicitors Athlone would not undertake the instructions given him on our behalf through John Glynn Our Family Solicitor.
Some months back we were informed that the Solicitors in the midlands would not challenge Mr. Robert Marren because he is the son in law of a prominent retired Solicitor from Athlone Aidan O’Carroll. While some Solicitors un the area will entertain the idea of suing Mr. Marren they are reluctant to assist us in preparing grounding affidavits against Marren and Henry in order to file a case against them to the Disciplinary Solicitors Tribunal.
We intend to file cases against Mr. Marren and Mr. Henry to the Disciplinary Solicitors Tribunal as soon as we have the grounding affidavits prepared even if we have to seek assistance overseas to help us prepare them, and we believe Justice will be served there.
Robert Marren Solicitor, Castle Street Mullingar refused to deal with our well founded objections and instead of taking the matter  to court as we instructed him to do he passed the book to me Michael Gavin 83 Years Old, threatening that he would close unless we issued proceedings to prevent him.
Tony Henry then did not contact Marren to object on our behalf as he was instructed, nor did he inform us so we could engage another Solicitor to challenge Mr. Marren.

There are numerous issues that need explaining including the following;

  1. Why was Willie Penrose TD BL not paid for his opinion when the Estate was charged for same?
  2. Why was John Glynn Solicitor not paid? Read Letter to Mr. Marren
  3. Why did Robert Marren Solicitor Mullingar refuse to award me Michael Gavin the Grant monies paid down from the Department of Agriculture?
  4. Why did Robert Marren Solicitor Mullingar refuse to pay me for time spent and services rendered in looking after the Estate animals?
  5. Why did T & N McLynn summon me to the high court in an attempt to sell the roof over my head? knowing full well I had the right to reside there for the rest of my days as per my father’s Will.
  6. Why did Robert Marren Solicitor Mullingar refuse to pay my sister and I the monies from the Auction of the lands immediately?
  7. Why did Robert Marren Solicitor Mullingar pay us €12,500 each less than what we were due for the Land sale?
  8. Why did Robert Marren Solicitor Mullingar not go back to court when there were objections from the beneficiaries that could not be dealt with?
  9. Why did Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone not undertake the instructions given him by a Solicitor to prevent Marren closing in isolation to our well founded objections?
  10. Why was an additional accountant hired? against our wishes
  11. Why did Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors Athlone write the letter he did to my sister Eileen?
  12. follow this link Bones of Contention for more.

I want Justice in this matter and will continue to share my story of Elder Abuse Wide and Far until my demands are met.

You see I believe with every bone in my body that a grave injustice has been served to my elder sister Eileen and I (83 years old) at the hands of the beneficiaries of the Estate and the Solicitors namely Robert Marren,  Tony Henry Tormeys Solicitors, Athlone and T & N McLynn Solicitors, Athlone.

I believe that it is they that need explain their reasons for treating my sister and I in the manner that they did.

I feel that the greatest help you can be to me at this time is to condemn this behavior which constitutes #ElderAbuse of the highest order

I would be much obliged if you would email marrensolrs@eircom.netthenry@tormeys.ie,complaints@lawsociety.ie and express your dissatisfaction at what has occurred in this matter.

Thank you

@michaelgavin83

Sign the petition

Please Support Michael Gavin Elderly 83 Year Old Irish Farmer by Signing Petition

Some Comments made

pmac

JasonFitzgerald2

joan

Charlie-Melia

JUSTICEmaggie1960larryreillyBealBinnKateTeri-commentlarry

facebook-logo

Twitter-icon

​Please Support Michael Gavin Elderly 83 Year Old Irish Farmer by Signing Petition

​Attachments area

On the Law

law

Sign the petition

Regulation 4(2): by failing without delay to pay monies held or controlled by them in respect of outlays not yet disbursed into client account and failing to treat such monies in all respects as client money;

Regulation 5: by holding monies to which they were beneficially entitled in a client account for longer than three months in respect of outlays already disbursed, or which should have been the subject matter of a bill of costs furnished to the client concerned;

When a solicitor is requested to furnish a detailed bill of costs, the requirements set out in Order 99, Rules of the Superior Courts are relevant. This was confirmed by the High Court in Smyth v. Montgomery.43 Order 99, rule 29(5) requires a bill of costs to adopt the following format: “ Bills of costs are to be prepared with seven separate columns:—

( a ) the first or lefthand column for dates;

( b ) the second for the numbers of the items;

( c ) the third for the particulars of the services charged for;

( d ) the fourth for disbursements;

( e ) the fifth for the Taxing Masters’ deductions from disbursements;

( f ) the sixth for the professional charges;

( g ) the seventh for the Taxing Masters’ deductions from professional charges.” These requirements must be complied with and, in the event that the bill of costs is not within the requisite format, the time allowed for a client to submit the bill for taxation will not begin to run.44

There are important judicial pronouncements regarding the content of bills of costs in contentious matters.45 A solicitor who is required to deliver a detailed bill of costs in a non-contentious matter should heed those decisions regarding the preparation of bills of costs in contentious matters.

http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/LegalCostsIreland.pdf/Files/LegalCostsIreland.pdf

good-lawyers-know-the-law-great-lawyers-know-the-judge

Giving an Undertaking

Introduction

Despite the importance attached to their observation, undertakings are a part of everyday practice which many solicitors still tend either to over look or, at best, pay insufficient attention to.

A solicitor’s undertaking is not just an enforceable agreement, it is something the breach of which can give rise to professional regulatory sanctions. Despite this, many solicitors do not realise how easily they can arise and how failing to monitor undertakings given by others within the firm can give rise to problems for the firm as a whole.

It is always worth bearing in mind just how easily they can arise and that if entered into without appropriate thought being given to their terms that the firm can be exposed to significant consequences.

The Regulations on Undertakings

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Handbook defines an undertaking as:

“a statement, given orally or in writing, whether or not it includes the word “undertake” or “undertaking”, made by or on behalf of you or your firm, in the course of practice, or by you outside the course of practice but as a solicitor or REL, to someone who reasonably places reliance on it, that you or your firm will do something or cause something to be done, or refrain from doing something.”

This is a fairly wide ranging definition and encompasses statements which, whilst not intended to create an undertaking, nevertheless do so.

http://www.lawyersdefencegroup.org.uk/giving-an-undertaking/

Caselaw

Courts Service
Full text ‘Judgments’ database – Supreme Court judgments since 2001; High Court and Court of Criminal Appeal judgments since 2004.

BAILII (British and Irish Legal Information Institute)
Full text of Supreme Court, High Court and Court of Criminal Appeal judgments since 2000 and selected pre-2000 judgments

IRLII (Irish Legal Information Initiative)
Full text recent Irish cases and selected pre-2000 cases. Indexes to cases.

Contact DetailsAddress: Claims Administrator, Law Society of Ireland, George’s Court, George’s Lane, North King Street, Dublin 7
DX: DX 1025 Four Courts
Phone: +353 1 879 8700
Fax: +353 1 879 8769
Email: cfclaims@lawsociety.ie

 

Sign the petitiontableofcontents

%d bloggers like this: